Skip to main content
Skip to guide content

Distinguish · 01 Editorial guide

Quality vs defect vs safety

A disappointed buyer is not automatically a defect case. Safety defect and quality complaint are different files.

First job Name whether the issue is quality, a defect that makes the product unsafe, or a regulatory non-conformity.

Start here

Start here

Key considerations

The first questions are about urgency, governance and preservation — before collection expands or interviews begin.

  1. Is anyone hurt or at imminent risk?
  2. Is the product unsafe, or only not as described?
  3. Is a regulator already involved?

Decision map

Keep the question bounded.

  1. Screen harmInjury belongs on the injury route first.
  2. Name the issue typeQuality, defect, or labelling/channel.
  3. Hand off clocksRecall duties have their own calendar.

Quick answers

Need the short version? Start with one narrow question.

These explainers answer one question. They do not replace this topic route or a deep guide.

Curated resources

Open the asset that matches this job.

Helpful to prepare

Facts that make the next conversation clearer.

These items are orientation aids, not a legal requirement list.

Product and batch at a high levelWhether anyone is injuredComplaint versus regulator contact

Local context

Add the city when market-supervision practice changes.

SAMR, sampling and court practice can differ after the national defect or recall question is identified.

Open city and province guides

Counsel hand-off

Need product-liability counsel?

This hub organises defect, injury, recall and channel questions. It does not decide defect, run a recall or settle a claim on your facts.

Find product-liability counsel

Submit an initial enquiry

Need qualified counsel?

Move carefully. Move with a record.

Use the portal to identify counsel for this practice and related China-side issues.