The classification screen

4 questions before you choose the route.

This page identifies the right question and evidence. It does not determine the legal outcome on a reader’s facts.

01

Related-party debt identified?

Map loans.

Debt
02

Ratio test passed?

Compute.

Ratio
03

Rate arm’s length?

TP overlay.

Rate
04

Really a service fee?

Character.

Label

Working rule: Apply the thin-cap ratio first, then test whether the interest rate and related-party terms are supportable under transfer-pricing rules.

What changes the answer

The signal ledger.

These facts move the question beyond a label and into a product, money-flow and control analysis.

Signal
Ask the operating question
Why it changes the route
Shareholder loan with no ratio check
Deduction surprise.
Model.
Relabel interest as service fee casually
Invites both TP and WHT issues.
Careful.
Ignore financial-enterprise ratio differences
Wrong ratio.
Check sector.
Prepare before you escalate

Bring a compact evidence docket—not a pitch deck.

Give a compliance team or counsel the operating facts that reveal the perimeter.

01Loan agreementsTerms.
02Equity vs debt balancesRatio inputs.
03Interest invoices/withholdingWhat was paid.
Common confusions

Questions people ask before they build.

Short answers for orientation. The right result can change with the service model and current rules.

Does thin-cap kill the loan legally?

It is mainly a deduction limitation for CIT, not automatic voiding of civil debt. Still model cash.

Where is TP docs?

Open /transfer-pricing-documentation-in-china.

Primary authorities

Reviewed sources support orientation, not a fact-specific assessment.