The classification screen

4 questions before you choose the route.

This page identifies the right question and evidence. It does not determine the legal outcome on a reader’s facts.

01

What services were actually performed?

Substance.

Work
02

TP method support?

Resolve the tp method support question separately before choosing the route.

TP
03

WHT/VAT on the fee?

Character.

Tax
04

Bank pack ready?

Resolve the bank pack ready question separately before choosing the route.

FX

Working rule: Related-party service fees (HQ management, IT, secondment recharge) sit at the junction of CIT deductibility, VAT/fapiao, WHT, transfer pricing and outbound FX.

What changes the answer

The signal ledger.

These facts move the question beyond a label and into a product, money-flow and control analysis.

Signal
Ask the operating question
Why it changes the route
100% of profit upstreamed as ‘service’
TP audit bait.
Revisit.
Broader Tax & Fiscal Compliance analysis needed
Do the facts extend beyond the threshold Related-Party Service Fees in China question?
Additional facts can change the Tax & Fiscal Compliance route, evidence and next step.
No fapiao / wrong fapiao
Deduction risk.
Fapiao page.
Prepare before you escalate

Bring a compact evidence docket—not a pitch deck.

Give a compliance team or counsel the operating facts that reveal the perimeter.

01Service agreement + SOWsDeliverables.
02Time records / work productSubstance.
03WHT and VAT filingsTax cost.
Common confusions

Questions people ask before they build.

Short answers for orientation. The right result can change with the service model and current rules.

Can we remit without a contract?

Banks and tax alike hate it. Put the paper trail first.

Where is the FX how-to?

Use the linked specialist resource when Related-Party Service Fees in China turns on detailed evidence, procedure or risk assessment.

Primary authorities

Reviewed sources support orientation, not a fact-specific assessment.