Professional profile
About Jan
Brussels Focus — Commercial Arbitration
Jan Peeters advises clients connected with Brussels on commercial arbitration matters, with emphasis on usable documents, procedural deadlines and enforcement reality under Chinese law.
Jan Peeters practices at Peeters & Co Advocaten. Professional experience on file is approximately 17 years years. Educational background includes KU Leuven Faculty of Law. This listing is maintained for businesses and individuals who need a concrete point of contact and a written plan rather than a generic statute summary.
Multi-contract relationships—supply, guarantee and side letters—must be read as a system. In Brussels, the location of counterparties, assets and decision-makers often drives sequencing as much as black-letter rules.
Forum and interim measures
Cost and time budgets should be set before the first filing so strategy is not driven only by the other side’s pace.
Jan Peeters typically starts with a document and timeline review: operative agreements, performance and payment records, notices already issued, and any administrative or platform correspondence. The output is a written risk map covering liability theories, defences, interim options and settlement leverage.
Commercial disputes reward parties who preserve evidence early and choose a forum that can deliver enforceable relief.
Risk Map Before Outreach
Work tied to Brussels benefits from knowing how local institutions actually move files—what evidence packages are expected, how long common applications take, and when bilingual materials help overseas stakeholders authorise the next step.
Property preservation and behavioural injunctions can matter more than a final judgment years later. Eligibility and bond requirements should be checked at the outset.
- Enforcement mapping tailored to Brussels operating facts
- Forum and interim measures with written options and deadlines
- Evidence preservation for management and overseas stakeholders
- New inquiries via this profile contact form, routed by listing id
Settlement is not merely a discount on claim amount. Payment security, default clauses and confidentiality terms decide whether a deal holds.
Materials Checklist for New Matters
Engagements are confirmed in writing, including scope, fees and communication protocols. Jan Peeters does not promise outcomes; the commitment is accurate analysis, disciplined preparation and clear updates as facts evolve.
Remote consultations are available for parties outside Brussels, including international clients who need English-language summaries of Chinese procedural stages. Chinese-language work product remains available where authorities or counterparties require it.
When using this profile's contact form, please include: parties involved; city where the main facts arose; whether the matter is pre-dispute, in negotiation, in formal proceedings, or under administrative or criminal inquiry; fixed deadlines; and the first document set you can share. Clear inputs allow useful triage without repeated clarifying rounds.
If accountants, HR advisors or industry consultants are already involved, say so at intake. Coordinated messaging reduces inconsistent statements across channels—an avoidable source of risk in Chinese disputes and regulatory processes.
Where urgent dates already exist—hearings, administrative reply windows or contractual notice periods—flag them first so preservation and interim measures take priority over a leisurely full-file review.
Preparation Notes for Brussels Files
Useful first packages usually include the main contracts and amendments, key invoices or payment records, a short chronology, and notices already exchanged. Perfect organisation is not required; a partial set beats silence when a deadline is running.
Maps of entities, sites, warehouses or project locations help translate paper claims into enforcement reality. If assets or decision-makers sit outside Brussels, state that early so forum and recognition issues are considered before sunk cost accumulates in the wrong venue.
Until scope is confirmed, clients should avoid improvised side letters, public statements or unplanned employee interviews. Those steps are often well intentioned and frequently expensive to unwind.
Jan Peeters will confirm next steps in writing after the initial review, including which issues are urgent, which can wait, and which require local specialists outside the current mandate. That sequencing keeps costs predictable for cross-border teams.
Additional coordination for Brussels includes aligning internal stakeholders before any outreach, so that Jan Peeters's written plan is not undermined by improvised messages from commercial teams.
Where multiple contracts interact—supply, guarantee, side letters or platform terms—Jan Peeters reads them as one system rather than isolated clauses, which is often where leverage is hidden in Brussels disputes.
Clients should expect candid discussion of weak points in their own file. Overstating strength early delays the work needed to fix evidence gaps that Brussels decision-makers will notice quickly.
Capability
