Skip to main content

China-related matters · Research first

For lawyers/Contact/Log in
China Legal PortalResearch · Routes · Counsel
Ask a lawyer

Search the portal

China Legal Guides · Arbitration forum comparison

Choose the arbitration forum by the transaction and enforcement map

Compare institution and seat separately, then test rules, court support, language, tribunal formation, cost, sector fit and target assets.

Decision guide

Operational orientation · Qualified PRC counsel required for fact-specific decisions

Reviewed foundation

No institution is universally best for every China-related contract.

The underlying comparison was legally reviewed by Haiyang Zhang. The new operational presentation and any expanded orientation are subject to legal review and claim no additional expert approval.

Forum comparison

Compare the controlling design questions

Institution rules and law change. Verify the current position before drafting.

Time on site

Do not assume the institution name alone fixes seat, language or court.

Design line

Do not rank institutions without first fixing the parties, transaction, relief and asset map. The useful comparison is case-specific, not a global league table.

Forum brief

Record the transaction facts before choosing

Selections remain in this browser.

Forum questions

Avoid institution-name shortcuts

New presentation is subject to legal review.

Is CIETAC always best for China assets?

No. Match the clause, seat, court-support route and enforcement map to the transaction.

Are HKIAC and a Hong Kong seat the same decision?

No. Institution and legal seat should be considered and stated separately.

Can one clause name several institutions?

Ambiguous alternatives can create a preliminary dispute; obtain transaction-specific drafting advice.

Source station

Use current law and each institution’s official rules.

Arbitration library

Connect forum choice to clause and enforcement

Each route owns a different decision.

Counsel handoff

Escalate before the institution and seat are committed

Use the record built here for current, fact-specific advice.

A deadline or proceeding is liveDo not calculate or waive a right from this orientation.

Assets or evidence may moveUrgent relief and lawful preservation need immediate analysis.

The instrument or forum is uncertainClassify it before committing to a route.

01
Prepare a dispute enquiryProvide the instrument, parties, dates, evidence, assets and requested result.
→02
Find dispute counselCompare relevant specialists.
→

General information only, not legal advice. The operational presentation is subject to legal review. Confirm current law, procedure, institution rules and local practice before acting.

Topic counsel

Profiles matched by practice to this topic. A shortlist for consultation — not an endorsement of any filing, clearance or legal outcome.

Practice-matchedVerified status shown per profileFree initial consultation