The classification screen

4 questions before you choose the route.

This page identifies the right question and evidence. It does not determine the legal outcome on a reader’s facts.

01

Is the document e-sign eligible?

Exclusions.

Scope
02

Reliable platform/process?

Identity+integrity.

Platform
03

Authority of signer proven?

POA/role.

Authority
04

Chop still expected by counterparty?

Culture.

Chop

Working rule: China’s Electronic Signature Law recognises electronic signatures that meet reliability conditions, enabling paperless execution for many civil/commercial contracts, with exclusions for personal-status documents and other restricted categories.

What changes the answer

The signal ledger.

These facts move the question beyond a label and into a product, money-flow and control analysis.

Signal
Ask the operating question
Why it changes the route
Screenshot signature as execution
Weak evidence.
Use proper e-sign.
Ignore exclusions (adoption/real property forms)
Invalid risk.
Check statute.
Skip chops page entirely
Parallel practice.
Additional facts can change the Business & Contract route, evidence and next step.
Prepare before you escalate

Bring a compact evidence docket—not a pitch deck.

Give a compliance team or counsel the operating facts that reveal the perimeter.

01E-sign certificate/audit logReliability.
02Authority documentsWho signed.
03Executed PDF+seal if anyDeal file.
Common confusions

Questions people ask before they build.

Short answers for orientation. The right result can change with the service model and current rules.

Can we e-sign an employment contract?

Often yes in practice with compliant tools — confirm current labour/local practice.

Where are chops?

Use the linked specialist resource when Electronic Signatures in China turns on detailed evidence, procedure or risk assessment.

Primary authorities

Reviewed sources support orientation, not a fact-specific assessment.