Cross-border enforcement sources: classify the instrument before opening the authority file
Use the source family matching a contractual claim, arbitral award, court judgment, service request, evidence request or asset measure. Save the current official text and effective date before drawing a conclusion.
Source guide
The reviewed source taxonomy is preserved; the new source links and operational presentation are subject to legal review.
The underlying article was reviewed by Shi Bingbing. This expansion claims no additional expert approval. Official pages are starting points, not a complete authority file; confirm amendments, reservations, declarations, implementing rules, judicial interpretations and local procedure for the actual matter.
Open the source family that owns the legal instrument
Do not use arbitration materials for court judgments or recognition materials for an unresolved contractual claim.
PRC civil procedure
Jurisdiction, service, evidence, preservation, foreign-related procedure, recognition and execution under current PRC procedural law and interpretations.
Contract and security
Claim basis, performance, breach, guarantees, security, limitation interfaces and debtor obligations.
Arbitration law and rules
Agreement, seat, institution, procedure, court support, award challenge and the selected institution’s current rules.
Foreign awards
The New York Convention, China’s status and reservations, PRC implementing procedure and case-specific refusal questions.
Foreign judgments
Current PRC procedure, applicable treaty or reciprocity materials, finality, service and refusal issues for the issuing jurisdiction.
Cross-border service and evidence
The relevant Hague Conference instrument, status table, declarations, central authorities and domestic receiving procedure.
Destination enforcement
The destination’s recognition statute, treaty or common-law framework, court rules, limitation and asset-execution procedure.
Preserve a versioned source trail
Selections remain in this browser and are not submitted. Source sufficiency remains subject to legal review.
Keep the authority hierarchy visible
All expanded answers are subject to legal review.
Is the New York Convention used for foreign court judgments?
No. It addresses qualifying foreign arbitral awards. Foreign court judgments require a separate recognition framework.
Does a treaty status page answer the complete filing question?
No. Check reservations, declarations, domestic implementation, court rules, documents, service and current procedure.
Can an English translation replace the controlling text?
Do not assume so. Record the controlling language and use reliable translations for working purposes.
Should the source file be refreshed after counsel begins work?
Yes, when a rule, interpretation, institution rule, status entry, filing fact or target jurisdiction changes.
Official starting points
These official sources were checked on 24 August 2026. Confirm the current page and controlling instrument before use.
Open the workflow matching the source question
The source station supports each route without reproducing its procedural analysis.
Debt Enforcement Hub
Classify inbound, outbound, claim, award or judgment.
Open specialist route →02 · Foreign awardForeign Arbitral Awards in China
Use for the Convention and PRC award-enforcement workflow.
Open specialist route →03 · Foreign judgmentForeign Judgments in China
Use for recognition of a foreign court title.
Open specialist route →Escalate before a source summary becomes a filing conclusion
Qualified counsel should confirm the authority set and its application to the instrument, parties, dates and assets.
A limitation or challenge clock may runCurrent law and official service facts must control the calculation.
Treaty status or reciprocity is disputedJurisdiction-specific authority and current court practice are required.
Several jurisdictions or titles are involvedCoordinate separate recognition and execution routes.
General source navigation only, not legal advice. The Shi Bingbing-reviewed source taxonomy is preserved; new links, descriptions and operational presentation are subject to legal review. Verify the current official text, status, reservations, declarations, interpretations and local procedure before acting.



