4 questions before you choose the route.
This page identifies the right question and evidence. It does not determine the legal outcome on a reader’s facts.
Civil AUCL or criminal file?
Which track.
TrackWhat is the secret and the measure?
Secrecy proof.
SecretCustody risk for the employee?
Detention pages.
CustodyDoes this issue require separate analysis?
Cross-link.
IPWorking rule: Infringing trade secrets can proceed under Anti-Unfair Competition Law and, where Criminal Law thresholds and elements are met, as a criminal case.
The signal ledger.
These facts move the question beyond a label and into a product, money-flow and control analysis.
Bring a compact evidence docket—not a pitch deck.
Give a compliance team or counsel the operating facts that reveal the perimeter.
Questions people ask before they build.
Short answers for orientation. The right result can change with the service model and current rules.
When is a more detailed analysis needed?
One nests under IP enforcement; this one nests under criminal defense for the custody/charge overlay. Cross-read both.
Where is employee theft civil/IP detail?
Use the linked specialist resource when Criminal Trade Secret Infringement in China turns on detailed evidence, procedure or risk assessment.
Primary authorities
Reviewed sources support orientation, not a fact-specific assessment.