The classification screen

4 questions before you choose the route.

This page identifies the right question and evidence. It does not determine the legal outcome on a reader’s facts.

01

Civil AUCL or criminal file?

Which track.

Track
02

What is the secret and the measure?

Secrecy proof.

Secret
03

Custody risk for the employee?

Detention pages.

Custody
04

Does this issue require separate analysis?

Cross-link.

IP

Working rule: Infringing trade secrets can proceed under Anti-Unfair Competition Law and, where Criminal Law thresholds and elements are met, as a criminal case.

What changes the answer

The signal ledger.

These facts move the question beyond a label and into a product, money-flow and control analysis.

Signal
Ask the operating question
Why it changes the route
Broader Criminal Defense analysis needed
Do the facts extend beyond the threshold Criminal Trade Secret Infringement in China question?
Additional facts can change the Criminal Defense route, evidence and next step.
Delete laptops first
Obstruction overlay.
Hold.
NDA alone as the case
Missing secrecy measures.
Weak.
Prepare before you escalate

Bring a compact evidence docket—not a pitch deck.

Give a compliance team or counsel the operating facts that reveal the perimeter.

01Secrecy measures filePolicies, access logs.
02Download/transfer recordsWhat moved.
03Detention or demand lettersWhich track.
Common confusions

Questions people ask before they build.

Short answers for orientation. The right result can change with the service model and current rules.

When is a more detailed analysis needed?

One nests under IP enforcement; this one nests under criminal defense for the custody/charge overlay. Cross-read both.

Where is employee theft civil/IP detail?

Use the linked specialist resource when Criminal Trade Secret Infringement in China turns on detailed evidence, procedure or risk assessment.

Primary authorities

Reviewed sources support orientation, not a fact-specific assessment.