Prove the secret, the measures, and that this person took or used it — then pick labour, AUCL or crime.
Employees are the highest-frequency respondents. During employment they have access; on exit they have a new employer. A trade-secret case still needs the three AUCL limbs plus evidence of acquisition, disclosure or use. USB copies, personal email, WeChat files and still-open VPN tokens are typical traces. Confidentiality duties apply without monthly pay; a non-compete needs compensation and only stops certain jobs. Do not skip the labour investigation process if you also want a for-cause dismissal. Criminal referral is for serious, high-value theft — not a routine HR dispute.
4 questions before you choose the route.
This page identifies the right question and evidence. It does not determine the legal outcome on a reader’s facts.
What secret did they have access to?
Identify it before you image everything.
SecretWhat traces show taking?
Logs, devices, personal accounts, timing versus resignation.
TakingIs there use at the new company?
Same code, list, or process appearing after the move.
UseWhich tools besides AUCL?
Dismissal, non-compete, copyright, criminal referral.
StackWorking rule: Map the regulated role before marketing or launch in China.
The signal ledger.
These facts move the question beyond a label and into a product, money-flow and control analysis.
Bring a compact evidence docket—not a pitch deck.
Give a compliance team or counsel the operating facts that reveal the perimeter.
Questions people ask before they build.
Short answers for orientation. The right result can change with the service model and current rules.
Can we search their personal WeChat?
Not as a default. Company WeCom and devices are different from personal accounts. See the WeChat-review Quick Answer.
Should we fire first or sue first?
Preserve first. A sloppy Art. 39 firing can become its own labour case while the secret walks.
Primary authorities
Reviewed sources support orientation, not a fact-specific assessment.