4 questions before you choose the route.
This page identifies the right question and evidence. It does not determine the legal outcome on a reader’s facts.
What secret did they have access to?
Identify it before you image everything.
SecretWhat traces show taking?
Logs, devices, personal accounts, timing versus resignation.
TakingIs there use at the new company?
Same code, list, or process appearing after the move.
UseWhich tools besides AUCL?
Dismissal, non-compete, copyright, criminal referral.
StackWorking rule: Employees are the highest-frequency respondents. During employment they have access; on exit they have a new employer.
The signal ledger.
These facts move the question beyond a label and into a product, money-flow and control analysis.
Bring a compact evidence docket—not a pitch deck.
Give a compliance team or counsel the operating facts that reveal the perimeter.
Questions people ask before they build.
Short answers for orientation. The right result can change with the service model and current rules.
Can we search their personal WeChat?
Not as a default. Company WeCom and devices are different from personal accounts. See the WeChat-review Quick Answer.
Should we fire first or sue first?
Preserve first. A sloppy Art. 39 firing can become its own labour case while the secret walks.
Primary authorities
Reviewed sources support orientation, not a fact-specific assessment.