4 questions before you choose the route.
This page identifies the right question and evidence. It does not determine the legal outcome on a reader’s facts.
Is a licence required at all?
List, catch-all, or a temporary control.
NeedWhich authority and which form?
Dual-use vs other catalogues.
WhoDo the licence conditions match the live deal?
Quantity, user, destination, validity.
MatchIs a foreign licence also required?
China paper does not satisfy EAR/EU.
StackWorking rule: Under the Export Control Law, exporters of controlled items apply to the competent authority (often MOFCOM for dual-use) with item identity, end-user and end-use documents, and other required materials.
The signal ledger.
These facts move the question beyond a label and into a product, money-flow and control analysis.
Bring a compact evidence docket—not a pitch deck.
Give a compliance team or counsel the operating facts that reveal the perimeter.
Questions people ask before they build.
Short answers for orientation. The right result can change with the service model and current rules.
Can we ship first and file later?
No for controlled exports. Retroactive paper does not cure an unlicensed export.
Does a general licence exist like the EAR?
China uses its own licence types and facilitations, which change. Do not import US ‘NLR’ or EAR99 thinking. Check current MOFCOM practice.
Primary authorities
Reviewed sources support orientation, not a fact-specific assessment.