The classification screen

4 questions before you choose the route.

This page identifies the right question and evidence. It does not determine the legal outcome on a reader’s facts.

01

Is the court already seized?

In-court vs private mediation.

Forum
02

Do you need an enforceable instrument?

mediation statement vs private MOU.

Output
03

Any criminal overlay?

Fraud facts.

Crime
04

Confidentiality vs later trial?

What can be reused.

Privilege

Working rule: Civil Procedure Law expects courts to mediate when appropriate. If parties settle, the court may issue a mediation statement that is enforceable.

What changes the answer

The signal ledger.

These facts move the question beyond a label and into a product, money-flow and control analysis.

Signal
Ask the operating question
Why it changes the route
WeChat settlement as mediation statement
No court chop.
Not executable.
Broader Dispute Resolution analysis needed
Out-of-court regime.
Additional facts can change the Dispute Resolution route, evidence and next step.
Labour mediation mix
Do the facts extend beyond the threshold China Court Mediation question?
Different path.
Prepare before you escalate

Bring a compact evidence docket—not a pitch deck.

Give a compliance team or counsel the operating facts that reveal the perimeter.

01Draft settlement termsMoney, time, confidentiality.
02Whether a case number existsIn-court path.
03Who can chop for the companyLR/authority.
Common confusions

Questions people ask before they build.

Short answers for orientation. The right result can change with the service model and current rules.

Can I refuse to mediate?

You can fail to agree. Courts still often try. Refusing in bad faith can colour costs/attitude, not usually the merits alone.

Where is the out-of-court piece?

Use the linked specialist resource when China Court Mediation turns on detailed evidence, procedure or risk assessment.

Primary authorities

Reviewed sources support orientation, not a fact-specific assessment.