The classification screen

4 questions before you choose the route.

This page identifies the right question and evidence. It does not determine the legal outcome on a reader’s facts.

01

What do you want the letter to do?

Clock, settlement, record.

Purpose
02

Will this text actually interrupt limitation?

Form and delivery.

Clock
03

Where will you send it?

Licence address vs WeChat.

Send
04

Any preservation that should go first?

Letter can tip a flight.

Freeze

Working rule: Counsel often send a lawyer's letter before filing. Uses: put the debtor on notice, invite a settlement, and sometimes interrupt limitation if the demand meets Civil Code form and is delivered.

What changes the answer

The signal ledger.

These facts move the question beyond a label and into a product, money-flow and control analysis.

Signal
Ask the operating question
Why it changes the route
US-style fee threat
Pasting ABA language.
Wrong audience.
WeChat only
No courier receipt.
Proof gap.
Broader Dispute Resolution analysis needed
Rewriting /collect-debt-chinese-company-foreign-creditor.
Additional facts can change the Dispute Resolution route, evidence and next step.
Prepare before you escalate

Bring a compact evidence docket—not a pitch deck.

Give a compliance team or counsel the operating facts that reveal the perimeter.

01Draft in ChineseThe version they will read.
02Licence addressWhere to courier.
03Limitation diaryWhether you still have time.
Common confusions

Questions people ask before they build.

Short answers for orientation. The right result can change with the service model and current rules.

Must a PRC lawyer send it?

A foreign letter can notify; a PRC lawyer's letter is what counterparties and clocks take seriously.

Where is the collection playbook?

Use the linked specialist resource when Demand Letters in China turns on detailed evidence, procedure or risk assessment.

Primary authorities

Reviewed sources support orientation, not a fact-specific assessment.