The house in China is usually PRC law; the London account may not be — nationality of the children is not the switch.
Mainland private-international-law rules generally send succession of immovables to the law of the place of the property, and movables toward the law of the deceased’s habitual residence at death (check the current Law on the Application of Law to Foreign-Related Civil Relations). A will’s form can be valid under several connecting factors. Heirs being foreign does not turn a Beijing flat into English law. This is a scoped wiki page, not a second L3 hub. Medium overlap with the long cross-border guide is why we keep it short and point there.
4 questions before you choose the route.
This page identifies the right question and evidence. It does not determine the legal outcome on a reader’s facts.
Is the asset immovable in the PRC?
Lex situs towards PRC law.
LandWhere was habitual residence at death?
Movables connector.
HomeWill form vs succession law?
Two different questions.
FormRenvoi / public policy?
Counsel-grade.
EdgeWorking rule: Map the regulated role before marketing or launch in China.
The signal ledger.
These facts move the question beyond a label and into a product, money-flow and control analysis.
Bring a compact evidence docket—not a pitch deck.
Give a compliance team or counsel the operating facts that reveal the perimeter.
Questions people ask before they build.
Short answers for orientation. The right result can change with the service model and current rules.
Can the will choose English law for a PRC apartment?
Party autonomy for succession of PRC immovables is limited. Do not rely on a boilerplate clause.
Where is the long guide?
Primary authorities
Reviewed sources support orientation, not a fact-specific assessment.