Technical and business information can be a secret; public or trivial information cannot.
The Anti-Unfair Competition Law covers both technical information (drawings, source, process parameters, formulae, algorithms) and business information (deep customer data, cost, undisclosed pricing, bidding strategy, supply sources). Each item must still pass the three limbs: not known to the public, commercial value, corresponding measures. A published patent specification, a product that is easy to reverse-engineer, a well-known company name, or a lunch roster is not a secret. This page is the subject-matter catalogue. The live framework page remains the three-limb definition — we are not replacing that URL.
4 questions before you choose the route.
This page identifies the right question and evidence. It does not determine the legal outcome on a reader’s facts.
Is it technical, business, or both?
Say which bucket before you plead ‘all company information’.
TypeIs it actually non-public?
Patent, manual, public website and easy reverse engineering fail this.
PublicDoes this item have standalone value?
A unique process yes; a generic org chart no.
ValueWas this item specifically protected?
Measures should match the item, not only a global footer.
MeasuresWorking rule: Map the regulated role before marketing or launch in China.
The signal ledger.
These facts move the question beyond a label and into a product, money-flow and control analysis.
Bring a compact evidence docket—not a pitch deck.
Give a compliance team or counsel the operating facts that reveal the perimeter.
Questions people ask before they build.
Short answers for orientation. The right result can change with the service model and current rules.
Can negative information (failed tests) be a secret?
Yes if it has value because competitors would save cost by knowing it, and it was kept secret with measures.
Where is the legal test itself?
On /china-trade-secrets-protection-legal-framework. This page only answers what kinds of information can qualify.
Primary authorities
Reviewed sources support orientation, not a fact-specific assessment.