Write a secrets duty and a non-compete as separate clauses with separate legal engines.
Employment confidentiality can last beyond the job and does not require monthly pay. It should define categories, marking, systems the employee must use, prohibition on personal WeChat dumps, and return of devices. Liquidated damages may be agreed but remain adjustable. A non-compete is a different clause: eligible staff, two-year cap, monthly compensation. Mixing ‘you may not work for a competitor and all information is secret’ into one paragraph is how both tools fail. Handbook democratic procedure still matters if the detailed rules live in the handbook. Employee-confidentiality already has a wiki page; this one is the contract-clause design.
4 questions before you choose the route.
This page identifies the right question and evidence. It does not determine the legal outcome on a reader’s facts.
Is this confidentiality, non-compete, or IP assignment?
Three clauses, three tests.
SplitDid you identify categories rather than ‘everything’?
Courts discount kitchen-sink secrets.
ScopeAre handbook rules consulted and publicised?
A clause that only points to an unpublished PDF is weak.
HandbookWhat happens on exit?
Return, token cut-off, and whether non-compete pay starts.
ExitWorking rule: Map the regulated role before marketing or launch in China.
The signal ledger.
These facts move the question beyond a label and into a product, money-flow and control analysis.
Bring a compact evidence docket—not a pitch deck.
Give a compliance team or counsel the operating facts that reveal the perimeter.
Questions people ask before they build.
Short answers for orientation. The right result can change with the service model and current rules.
Can one clause do secrets and non-compete?
You can put them in one document. You should not fuse the legal tests. Pay, class and two-year cap belong only to the non-compete.
Is this different from the employee-confidentiality Quick Answer?
That page is the duty and AUCL overlay. This page is how to draft the labour-contract clause without breaking either tool.
Primary authorities
Reviewed sources support orientation, not a fact-specific assessment.
