4 questions before you choose the route.
This page identifies the right question and evidence. It does not determine the legal outcome on a reader’s facts.
What rights are actually being granted?
Patent claims, secret know-how, software, or a brand — do not bundle blindly.
RightsIs the know-how still a secret?
If it is in a published specification, licence the patent, not a ‘secret’.
SecretDoes the deal cross the Chinese border?
Tech import/export catalogues and export-control lists.
BorderWho owns improvements?
Grant-back clauses need a China-enforceable allocation.
ImprovementsWorking rule: A technology licence should list patents, know-how, software copyright and improvements, exclusive or non-exclusive grant, field, territory, sublicensing, payment, and what happens to improvements.
The signal ledger.
These facts move the question beyond a label and into a product, money-flow and control analysis.
Bring a compact evidence docket—not a pitch deck.
Give a compliance team or counsel the operating facts that reveal the perimeter.
Questions people ask before they build.
Short answers for orientation. The right result can change with the service model and current rules.
Is every cross-border tech contract registrable?
Free, restricted and prohibited catalogues differ. Many ordinary contracts are registered for FX and customs practicality even when not ‘restricted’. Check the current catalogues; do not guess.
Can we licence know-how without a patent?
Yes if it is still a secret with measures. The AUCL and NNN overlay then matter as much as the licence text.
Primary authorities
Reviewed sources support orientation, not a fact-specific assessment.