The factory that sees the file must be the party on the NNN — not only the export agent.
Supplier risk is a party-identity problem plus a measures problem. Trading companies, sister plants, 1688 shops and home-town sub-suppliers are often different legal persons. An NNN or supply contract with the wrong chop does not bind the line. Flow-down, written subcontract consent, mould ownership, sample logs and need-to-know drawings are the corresponding measures at a vendor. AUCL can still reach some non-signers, but the cheap case is a signed plant. NNN and manufacturing-know-how pages sit beside this counterparty map.
4 questions before you choose the route.
This page identifies the right question and evidence. It does not determine the legal outcome on a reader’s facts.
Who actually machines or assembles?
Licence, address and who holds the moulds.
PlantDid that entity chop the NNN and supply agreement?
Trader-only paper is the usual hole.
PartyCan they subcontract without you?
If yes, the secret has an unknown audience.
Flow-downWhat do they receive — full CAD or a gated pack?
Need-to-know is a measure.
ScopeWorking rule: Map the regulated role before marketing or launch in China.
The signal ledger.
These facts move the question beyond a label and into a product, money-flow and control analysis.
Bring a compact evidence docket—not a pitch deck.
Give a compliance team or counsel the operating facts that reveal the perimeter.
Questions people ask before they build.
Short answers for orientation. The right result can change with the service model and current rules.
Is a PO enough to bind the factory?
A PO can form a supply contract. It rarely carries non-use, non-circumvention, mould ownership or audit. Use a master plus NNN with the plant.
Can AUCL help if they never signed?
Sometimes, if you still prove secret, measures and misappropriation. It is slower and harder than a chopped plant NNN.
Primary authorities
Reviewed sources support orientation, not a fact-specific assessment.