Measures must be real, matched to the information, and in place before the leak.
SPC and AUCL practice ask whether the right holder took measures corresponding to the commercial value and the way the information was held: need-to-know access, passwords, watermarks, confidential marking, physical isolation, NDAs or NNN with staff and suppliers, training, and retrieval of devices on exit. A single footer, or an NDA signed after the defendant already had the files, is usually not enough. Over-classifying everything can also hurt, because it suggests you did not identify what was actually secret. Measures are a limb of the secret, not a damages afterthought.
4 questions before you choose the route.
This page identifies the right question and evidence. It does not determine the legal outcome on a reader’s facts.
Who could access the information, and why?
Open drives and all-hands WeCom groups are the usual fail.
AccessWas it marked and logged?
Stamps, watermarks, DLP and access logs dated before the leak.
MarkingDid recipients sign a duty that actually binds them?
Employee handbook, NDA, NNN with the real factory.
ContractWhat happened on exit or supplier change?
Account cut-off and return certificates.
ExitWorking rule: Map the regulated role before marketing or launch in China.
The signal ledger.
These facts move the question beyond a label and into a product, money-flow and control analysis.
Bring a compact evidence docket—not a pitch deck.
Give a compliance team or counsel the operating facts that reveal the perimeter.
Questions people ask before they build.
Short answers for orientation. The right result can change with the service model and current rules.
Is encryption mandatory?
No single technology is mandatory. Encryption helps. The test is corresponding measures as a set, not one tool.
Do measures have to be perfect?
They have to be corresponding and genuine, not perfect. A serious lock plus a later breach can still be a secret.
Primary authorities
Reviewed sources support orientation, not a fact-specific assessment.