The classification screen

4 questions before you choose the route.

This page identifies the right question and evidence. It does not determine the legal outcome on a reader’s facts.

01

Defect and harm theory clear?

Facts.

Defect
02

Who is producer/operator in China?

Role.

Who
03

Does this issue require separate analysis?

Resolve the does this issue require separate analysis question separately before choosing the route.

Deep
04

Claims already arriving?

Resolve the claims already arriving question separately before choosing the route.

Claims

Working rule: China’s product recall framework expects producers and relevant operators to report, notify and remediate defective goods under SAMR-led systems, with sector overlays.

What changes the answer

The signal ledger.

These facts move the question beyond a label and into a product, money-flow and control analysis.

Signal
Ask the operating question
Why it changes the route
Broader Product Liability analysis needed
Do the facts extend beyond the threshold Product Recall in China question?
Additional facts can change the Product Liability route, evidence and next step.
Quiet refunds only
No regulator path.
Risk.
Destroy samples first
Evidence fail.
Hold.
Prepare before you escalate

Bring a compact evidence docket—not a pitch deck.

Give a compliance team or counsel the operating facts that reveal the perimeter.

01Incident/complaint logKnowledge clock.
02SKU traceabilityScope.
03Regulator noticesIf any.
Common confusions

Questions people ask before they build.

Short answers for orientation. The right result can change with the service model and current rules.

Is a platform takedown a recall?

It may be part of remediation, not a full recall file. Follow the obligations guide.

Where is the deep recall page?

Use the linked specialist resource when Product Recall in China turns on detailed evidence, procedure or risk assessment.

Primary authorities

Reviewed sources support orientation, not a fact-specific assessment.