Skip to main content
Skip to guide content

State compensation & police misconduct · 05 Editorial guide

State compensation & police misconduct

State-compensation claims and public-law remedies arising from unlawful administrative or police conduct.

First job Identify the alleged unlawful act, responsible organ and prerequisite procedure.

Start here

Start here

Key considerations

The first questions are about urgency, governance and preservation — before collection expands or interviews begin.

  1. Scope — State-compensation claims and public-law remedies arising from unlawful administrative or police conduct.
  2. Immediate task — Identify the alleged unlawful act, responsible organ and prerequisite procedure.
  3. Boundary — If another practice owns a distinct issue, use Related topics below rather than duplicating that analysis here.

Decision map

Keep the question bounded.

  1. Define the official conduct and resulting harmIdentify the agency and officers, legal power invoked, detention, force, seizure or other act, and the personal, property or business loss alleged.
  2. Preserve proof of illegality and lossCollect decisions, custody and medical records, video, witness evidence, property inventories, complaints and a supported calculation of compensable damage.
  3. Sequence correction and compensation claimsDetermine whether illegality must first be confirmed and route complaints, reconsideration, litigation and state-compensation applications without missing separate deadlines.

Curated resources

Open the asset that matches this job.

Helpful to prepare

Facts that make the next conversation clearer.

These items are orientation aids, not a legal requirement list.

The document, decision, contract, policy, licence, order or record that created the issue.The relevant parties/entities and their roles.A short chronology including notices, deadlines, filings, payments, incidents or procedural status.

Counsel hand-off

What to bring when you instruct

This topic route organises the national legal question. It does not decide rights, strategy, liability, approval outcome or procedural result on the facts. Use qualified PRC counsel where fact-specific advice or representation is required.

Local context

Add the city only when it changes implementation.

Add city or province context only when the responsible authority, court, registration practice, permit process or local implementation changes after the national route is identified.

Open city and province guides

Counsel hand-off

Need qualified PRC counsel?

Counsel can assess the challenged government act, preserve review deadlines and select the appropriate reconsideration, litigation or compensation route.

Find counsel by practice

Submit an initial enquiry

Need qualified counsel?

Move carefully. Move with a record.

Use the portal to identify counsel for this practice and related China-side issues.