Skip to main content
Skip to guide content

Administrative litigation · 02 Editorial guide

Administrative litigation

Judicial review of administrative acts in the People’s Courts, including standing, jurisdiction, evidence and available remedies.

First job Confirm that the challenged act is reviewable and preserve the filing clock.

Start here

Start here

Key considerations

The first questions are about urgency, governance and preservation — before collection expands or interviews begin.

  1. Scope — Judicial review of administrative acts in the People’s Courts, including standing, jurisdiction, evidence and available remedies.
  2. Immediate task — Confirm that the challenged act is reviewable and preserve the filing clock.
  3. Boundary — If another practice owns a distinct issue, use Related topics below rather than duplicating that analysis here.

Decision map

Keep the question bounded.

  1. Define defendant, act and court routeIdentify the responsible administrative body, challenged act or failure, claimant standing and the court with territorial and subject-matter jurisdiction.
  2. Protect filing and interim-relief positionsCalculate limitation from the correct notice or knowledge event and document enforcement effects, evidence access and any basis to suspend implementation.
  3. Build the legality challengeOrganize claims around authority, procedure, evidence and legal application, with relief matched to revocation, performance, confirmation or compensation.

Curated resources

Open the asset that matches this job.

Helpful to prepare

Facts that make the next conversation clearer.

These items are orientation aids, not a legal requirement list.

The document, decision, contract, policy, licence, order or record that created the issue.The relevant parties/entities and their roles.A short chronology including notices, deadlines, filings, payments, incidents or procedural status.

Counsel hand-off

What to bring when you instruct

This topic route organises the national legal question. It does not decide rights, strategy, liability, approval outcome or procedural result on the facts. Use qualified PRC counsel where fact-specific advice or representation is required.

Local context

Add the city only when it changes implementation.

Add city or province context only when the responsible authority, court, registration practice, permit process or local implementation changes after the national route is identified.

Open city and province guides

Counsel hand-off

Need qualified PRC counsel?

Counsel can assess the challenged government act, preserve review deadlines and select the appropriate reconsideration, litigation or compensation route.

Find counsel by practice

Submit an initial enquiry

Need qualified counsel?

Move carefully. Move with a record.

Use the portal to identify counsel for this practice and related China-side issues.