Contract and property-rights disputes
The 2022 Rules describe BAC/BIAC as resolving contractual disputes and other disputes over property rights and interests between natural persons, legal persons and other organizations.
Search the portal
北京仲裁委员会 / 北京国际仲裁中心
A Beijing arbitration institution administering contractual and other property-rights disputes under the BAC/BIAC Rules.
BAC/BIAC administers arbitration where the parties have agreed to submit a dispute to the institution. Its 2022 Rules identify BAC and BIAC as names for the same institution, address written arbitration agreements and jurisdictional objections, and govern filing, tribunal formation, proceedings and awards. The institution administers the case; courts remain relevant to preservation, challenges and enforcement under applicable law.
Confirm the institution named in the clause, the disputes covered, the applicable rules, the seat, language and tribunal mechanism before filing.
The 2022 Rules describe BAC/BIAC as resolving contractual disputes and other disputes over property rights and interests between natural persons, legal persons and other organizations.
The Rules contain ordinary and expedited procedures and special provisions for international commercial arbitration; the applicable route depends on the clause and case characteristics.
A practical orientation based on the institution's published materials; current rules and the arbitration agreement control.
Verify that the written clause identifies BAC/BIAC, covers the dispute and remains effective independently of the underlying contract.
The claimant submits the arbitration agreement, application, requested relief, supporting facts and evidence, and identity materials required by the Rules.
The claimant deposits the applicable arbitrator and administration fees under the current fee schedule; amounts depend on the sum in dispute.
The tribunal is formed under the appointment method in the agreement and Rules, subject to the applicable ordinary or expedited procedure.
The tribunal manages submissions, evidence and hearings before issuing an award. Court support may separately matter for preservation and enforcement.
Use these examples to identify what must be checked before treating the institution as the correct forum.
| Situation | Why it matters | What to check |
|---|---|---|
| The clause names Beijing International Arbitration Center | The 2022 Rules treat that name as designating BAC | Exact clause wording, scope, governing edition of the Rules and any agreed seat or language. |
| The contract contains only a general Beijing arbitration reference | The institution may not be identified with sufficient certainty | Validity and institutional identification under the applicable arbitration law before filing. |
| The amount in dispute may trigger expedited procedure | The Rules contain a monetary threshold and party-agreement provisions | Current threshold, tribunal size, fee consequences and any contrary party agreement. |
Start with primary institutional sources. Verify service links and procedural status before relying on a filing path.
Short, practical definitions for concepts most likely to appear alongside this institution.
The written agreement defining which disputes go to arbitration and which institution administers them.
A streamlined route available under the conditions set by the Rules or party agreement.
The court process used when an award debtor does not comply voluntarily.
The review date describes when the listed primary sources were checked. It is not a guarantee that jurisdiction remains unchanged after that date.
Review the complete arbitration clause and current Rules. Institution, scope, seat, language, tribunal selection and court-support strategy can affect the route.