Public generative-AI services are a CAC regime — a foreign API does not put you outside it.
CAC interim measures on generative AI, plus labelling, corpus and deep-synthesis rules, target services that offer GAI to the Chinese public. Providers face training-data, security-assessment, filing, and content-moderation duties. Users who integrate a foreign model into a China-facing product can still be providers. PIPL still applies to prompts and logs that are PI. Algorithm filing is a sibling overlay for recommendation engines. The live consumer-digital/algorithm guide stays the long national piece — this wiki page is the GAI definition. Do not freeze a filing-portal URL here.
4 questions before you choose the route.
This page identifies the right question and evidence. It does not determine the legal outcome on a reader’s facts.
Is the service offered to the PRC public?
App, site, API wrapper, WeChat.
PublicAre you a provider or a deploy-only user?
Who presents the model.
RoleDo prompts contain PI?
PIPL plus GAI.
PIIs there an algorithm-filing overlay?
Recommendation + GAI.
FilingWorking rule: Map the regulated role before marketing or launch in China.
The signal ledger.
These facts move the question beyond a label and into a product, money-flow and control analysis.
Bring a compact evidence docket—not a pitch deck.
Give a compliance team or counsel the operating facts that reveal the perimeter.
Questions people ask before they build.
Short answers for orientation. The right result can change with the service model and current rules.
Does this replace the consumer algorithm guide?
No. /china-consumer-digital-compliance-algorithm-pipl stays the long guide. This is the GAI wiki definition.
Do we file before launch?
Public GAI services typically need security assessment/filing under current CAC measures. Confirm the current list — do not launch on a wiki guess.
Primary authorities
Reviewed sources support orientation, not a fact-specific assessment.
