Treat resignation as a secrets event: freeze access, recover devices, and decide non-compete pay the same week.
Leavers keep relationships, WeChat groups and muscle memory. They also sometimes keep USB copies. A confidentiality duty continues, but it does not forbid working for a competitor. A non-compete can, if the person is in the statutory class and you pay compensation. AUCL still requires the three limbs plus taking or use. Exit certificates, token revocation, and a hold on CRM exports should be routine, not a special investigation. Employee-theft and non-compete pages sit beside this operational timeline.
4 questions before you choose the route.
This page identifies the right question and evidence. It does not determine the legal outcome on a reader’s facts.
What could they still access today?
VPN, git, CRM, WeCom, badge, personal forwards.
AccessDo you need a job restriction or only a secrets duty?
Pay a non-compete or accept that they may join a rival.
ToolWas there a download after notice?
That timing is the usual theft exhibit.
TakingWho is the new employer?
A rival in the same niche changes urgency.
DestWorking rule: Map the regulated role before marketing or launch in China.
The signal ledger.
These facts move the question beyond a label and into a product, money-flow and control analysis.
Bring a compact evidence docket—not a pitch deck.
Give a compliance team or counsel the operating facts that reveal the perimeter.
Questions people ask before they build.
Short answers for orientation. The right result can change with the service model and current rules.
Can we block them from joining a competitor with confidentiality only?
Generally no. Confidentiality stops use of information. A paid non-compete stops certain jobs. Do not mix the clauses.
Is every leaver a theft case?
No. Most are not. Investigate when logs, devices or a twin product appear — not because someone resigned.
Primary authorities
Reviewed sources support orientation, not a fact-specific assessment.