Confidentiality can outlast employment; a non-compete cannot replace it, and vice versa.
Staff who handle customer lists, source code, prices or process know-how should have a written confidentiality duty, access limits, and an exit return of devices and accounts. Unlike a non-compete, this duty does not depend on monthly compensation and is not capped at two years, but it only covers information, not a ban on working for a competitor in itself. To treat the information as a trade secret, you still need reasonable secrecy measures. A commercial NNN with a factory is a different paper from an employee duty. Mass ‘everything is secret’ clauses without marking or access control are weak in a fight.
4 questions before you choose the route.
This page identifies the right question and evidence. It does not determine the legal outcome on a reader’s facts.
What information is actually secret?
Identify categories; do not rely on a one-line ‘all company info’.
ScopeWere secrecy measures real?
Permissions, watermarks, NDAs on the way in, and a clean exit.
MeasuresDo you also need a paid non-compete?
Confidentiality will not stop a lawful new job by itself.
StackIs this staff or a factory?
Employees vs OEM NNN are different counterparties.
WhoWorking rule: Map the regulated role before marketing or launch in China.
The signal ledger.
These facts move the question beyond a label and into a product, money-flow and control analysis.
Bring a compact evidence docket—not a pitch deck.
Give a compliance team or counsel the operating facts that reveal the perimeter.
Questions people ask before they build.
Short answers for orientation. The right result can change with the service model and current rules.
Do we pay for confidentiality like a non-compete?
No monthly compensation is required for a confidentiality duty. Pay is the hallmark of a non-compete. Do not mix the two clauses.
Is this the same as the commercial confidentiality wiki page?
No. That page is counterparty NDAs. This page is the employment duty and trade-secret hygiene for staff.
Primary authorities
Reviewed sources support orientation, not a fact-specific assessment.
