The classification screen

4 questions before you choose the route.

This page identifies the right question and evidence. It does not determine the legal outcome on a reader’s facts.

01

Official or commercial counterparty?

Article family.

Who
02

AUCL file or criminal file?

Which agency.

Stack
03

Third-party pass-through?

Distributor DD overlay.

Third
04

Internal hold underway?

Investigations cluster.

Hold

Working rule: Commercial bribery sits in two stacks: Anti-Unfair Competition Law administrative enforcement and Criminal Law offences (including bribery involving non-state staff in covered settings, and official bribery when public officials are involved).

What changes the answer

The signal ledger.

These facts move the question beyond a label and into a product, money-flow and control analysis.

Signal
Ask the operating question
Why it changes the route
Only FCPA memo
Missing PRC criminal articles.
Gap.
Rewrite AUCL basics here
Do the facts extend beyond the threshold Commercial Bribery Crimes in China question?
Additional facts can change the Criminal Defense route, evidence and next step.
Cash ‘activity fund’ still running
Ongoing exposure.
Stop.
Prepare before you escalate

Bring a compact evidence docket—not a pitch deck.

Give a compliance team or counsel the operating facts that reveal the perimeter.

01Payment and gift trailWho got what.
02Recipient statusOfficial vs commercial.
03Tender/approval timelinePurpose.
Common confusions

Questions people ask before they build.

Short answers for orientation. The right result can change with the service model and current rules.

Is AUCL bribery automatically a crime?

No. Criminal Law has its own elements and thresholds. Many matters stay administrative.

When is a more detailed analysis needed?

Use the linked specialist resource when Commercial Bribery Crimes in China turns on detailed evidence, procedure or risk assessment.

Primary authorities

Reviewed sources support orientation, not a fact-specific assessment.