A China trade secret is secret, valuable, and actually protected — not merely labelled confidential.
AUCL Article 9 protects technical and business information that (1) is not known to the public, (2) has commercial value, and (3) the right holder has taken corresponding confidentiality measures to keep secret. A stamp that says ‘confidential’ is not enough if files sit on an open WeCom group. Employees, former staff, suppliers and hackers can all be respondents. Civil, administrative and criminal tracks exist; they need different evidence. This live URL is the definition-and-framework page — we are not creating what-is-a-trade-secret-under-chinese-law as a second slug.
4 questions before you choose the route.
This page identifies the right question and evidence. It does not determine the legal outcome on a reader’s facts.
Is the information actually not public?
Published patents, product reverse-engineering that is easy, and industry know-how fail this limb.
SecrecyDoes it have commercial value?
Customer lists, source, process parameters and bidding models usually do; trivia does not.
ValueWere corresponding measures real?
Access control, marking, NDAs/NNN, and exit return — contemporaneous, not after the leak.
MeasuresWhich track fits the harm?
Civil injunction, SAMR, or criminal referral are different files.
TrackWorking rule: Map the regulated role before marketing or launch in China.
The signal ledger.
These facts move the question beyond a label and into a product, money-flow and control analysis.
Bring a compact evidence docket—not a pitch deck.
Give a compliance team or counsel the operating facts that reveal the perimeter.
Questions people ask before they build.
Short answers for orientation. The right result can change with the service model and current rules.
Is a customer list automatically a trade secret?
No. It must be non-public, valuable, and protected. See the customer-list Quick Answer.
Do we need a registration?
No CNIPA registration creates a trade secret. Measures and proof do. Patents and trademarks are the opposite model.
Primary authorities
Reviewed sources support orientation, not a fact-specific assessment.