Direct answer

Stamp duty is a document tax on listed instruments — skipping it because ‘we only emailed the PDF’ is a weak plan.

China stamp duty (印花税) taxes specified documents (certain contracts, transfers, account books) at statutory or schedule rates. Electronic contracts can still be in scope. It is separate from VAT and CIT. Amounts are often small relative to deal value but audits still pick them up. This wiki is the definition. Share-transfer and financing documents are frequent triggers. Do not confuse with notary fees or government levies of other kinds.

The classification screen

4 questions before you choose the route.

This page identifies the right question and evidence. It does not determine the legal outcome on a reader’s facts.

01

Is the document on the taxable list?

Schedule.

List
02

Who files/pays?

Parties.

Payer
03

Electronic contract still taxable?

Often yes.

Form
04

Deal also has VAT/CIT?

Separate stacks.

Other

Working rule: Map the regulated role before marketing or launch in China.

What changes the answer

The signal ledger.

These facts move the question beyond a label and into a product, money-flow and control analysis.

Signal
Ask the operating question
Why it changes the route
No stamp because PDF only
Form over substance risk.
Check.
Bundle into ‘misc tax’ forever
No workpaper.
Weak.
Confuse with VAT on the same contract
Double mix-up.
Split.
Prepare before you escalate

Bring a compact evidence docket—not a pitch deck.

Give a compliance team or counsel the operating facts that reveal the perimeter.

01Executed contract setWhat was signed.
02Stamp duty payment proofIf any.
03Document type mappingWhich schedule item.
Common confusions

Questions people ask before they build.

Short answers for orientation. The right result can change with the service model and current rules.

Are all contracts stamped?

No — listed categories. Still verify before assuming zero.

Is this CIT?

No. Corporate income tax is a different tax.

Primary authorities

Reviewed sources support orientation, not a fact-specific assessment.