Foreign investment involving key technology or dual-use capability needs a multi-regime screen.
The transaction may implicate foreign-investment access and national-security review, while the underlying technology, technical data or products may separately be subject to export-control, cybersecurity or sector rules.
5 questions before you choose the route.
This page identifies the right question and evidence. It does not determine the legal outcome on a reader’s facts.
Check technology/item classification
Identify the relevant facts, documents and operating role before choosing the route.
Decision factorCheck foreign control and access rights
Identify the relevant facts, documents and operating role before choosing the route.
Decision factorCheck end use/end user
Identify the relevant facts, documents and operating role before choosing the route.
Decision factorCheck technical data transfer
Identify the relevant facts, documents and operating role before choosing the route.
Decision factorCheck sector and security sensitivity
Identify the relevant facts, documents and operating role before choosing the route.
Decision factorWorking rule: Map the regulated role before marketing or launch in China.
The signal ledger.
These facts move the question beyond a label and into a product, money-flow and control analysis.
Bring a compact evidence docket—not a pitch deck.
Give a compliance team or counsel the operating facts that reveal the perimeter.
Questions people ask before they build.
Short answers for orientation. The right result can change with the service model and current rules.
Does a patent licence alone force NSR filing?
Not automatically — combine sector, control and access facts. Do not self-clear from a licence label alone.
Where do export controls fit?
Separate regime. See the export-control hub and build both into diligence.
Primary authorities
Reviewed sources support orientation, not a fact-specific assessment.
Sources last checked: