Discretionary labels lose when the bonus was promised, formula-driven, or regularly paid.
Year-end bonuses, 13th-month pay and performance bonuses are a frequent arbitration item, especially on exit. If the contract or handbook sets a formula, or the company has paid the same bonus for years as part of remuneration, tribunals often treat it as wages. A clause that says ‘purely discretionary’ is weaker when targets were met and the employee was dismissed to avoid payment. Proration on resignation versus dismissal, and whether the person was in post on the payment date, should be written clearly and applied consistently.
4 questions before you choose the route.
This page identifies the right question and evidence. It does not determine the legal outcome on a reader’s facts.
Where is the bonus described?
Contract, handbook, offer letter, annual policy or only a manager email.
SourceIs there a formula or a true discretion?
KPI matrices look like wages; a board discretionary pool looks different.
NatureWhat has the company actually paid in past years?
Practice can harden a ‘discretionary’ label.
PracticeIs this an exit fight?
Timing of dismissal versus bonus date is the usual allegation.
ExitWorking rule: Map the regulated role before marketing or launch in China.
The signal ledger.
These facts move the question beyond a label and into a product, money-flow and control analysis.
Bring a compact evidence docket—not a pitch deck.
Give a compliance team or counsel the operating facts that reveal the perimeter.
Questions people ask before they build.
Short answers for orientation. The right result can change with the service model and current rules.
Can we say bonuses are not wages?
You can say it; a tribunal will still look at formula, regularity and the labor-contract wage definition. Many ‘discretionary’ bonuses are treated as wages on those facts.
Does resignation always forfeit the bonus?
Only if a lawful, publicised rule says so and it is applied even-handedly. A forfeiture aimed at one departing employee is fragile.
Primary authorities
Reviewed sources support orientation, not a fact-specific assessment.
